1. Introduction: Why RTI
Data Matters for IIM Udaipur Aspirants
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
What is RTI? |
Right to Information Act,
2005 β legally mandates public institutions including all IIMs to provide
accurate admission data within 30 days of formal request |
|
Why RTI > Other Sources |
Legally binding,
institution-verified, from official admission records; false/misleading RTI
responses attract penalties under the Act |
|
Scope of This Article |
IIM Udaipur CAT percentile
data (2019β2025), category-wise cutoffs, sectional trends, composite score
framework, peer IIM comparison |
|
Key Distinction |
Qualifying cutoff = minimum
for PI-WAT shortlist (Stage 1). Final admission percentile = actual lowest
score of admitted students (higher, more competitive) |
|
Data Source |
RTI responses from IIM
Udaipur Admission Office; cross-verified across multiple RTI filings |
|
Categories Covered |
General, EWS, NC-OBC, SC,
ST, PwD |
|
Important 2026 Update |
IIM Udaipur has opted out
of CAP (Common Admission Process) for 2026β28 batch and will now conduct
independent selection process |
RTI vs Other Sources β
Reliability Comparison
|
Parameter |
RTI Data |
Coaching Estimate |
Media / Portals |
Student Forums |
|
Source |
Official Institute Records |
Limited student surveys |
Crowdsourced / unofficial |
Anecdotal / self-reported |
|
Legal Status |
Legally binding; penalties
for false info |
None |
None |
None |
|
Accuracy |
High |
LowβMedium |
LowβMedium |
Low |
|
Category Breakup |
Available |
Rarely |
Sometimes |
Rarely |
|
Year-wise Data |
Precise multi-year records |
Selective |
Incomplete |
Incomplete |
|
Bias Risk |
None |
High (enrollment incentive) |
High |
Very High |
|
Granularity |
Lowest admitted %ile,
composite cutoffs, waitlist stats |
Overall estimate only |
Overall estimate only |
Individual anecdotes |
2. IIM Udaipur β
Institutional Profile
|
Parameter |
Details |
|
Full Name |
Indian Institute of
Management Udaipur |
|
Established |
2011 (Second-generation IIM
expansion by Government of India) |
|
Location |
Balicha, Udaipur, Rajasthan |
|
Campus |
Permanent campus β 300
acres; modern classrooms, library, hostels, sports complex, collaborative
spaces; Rajasthani-contemporary architecture |
|
Peer Institutes (Same Wave) |
IIM Kashipur, IIM Raipur,
IIM Ranchi, IIM Rohtak, IIM Tiruchirappalli |
|
Program Offered |
Two-year Full-time MBA
(Residential) |
|
Annual Intake |
~250 students |
|
Academic Structure |
Core courses (Year 1) +
Specialized electives + Experiential learning (Year 2) |
|
International
Accreditations |
AACSB (held by <6% of
business schools worldwide) + AMBA (UK) β dual accreditation |
|
Admission Process (2026β28) |
Independent process (opted
out of CAP); own PI-WAT with institute-specific weightage |
|
Placement (2023β25 Batch) |
100% placement; Average INR
17.08 LPA; Highest domestic INR 36 LPA; Highest international INR 57.14 LPA |
|
Recruiter Count |
150+ companies across
consulting, BFSI, FMCG, tech, e-commerce, analytics, manufacturing |
|
Top Recruiters |
Deloitte, EY, major
financial institutions, leading tech companies, prominent consumer brands |
3. Selection Criteria β
Complete Framework
3.1 Stage-wise Selection
Process
|
Stage |
Component |
Details |
|
Stage 1 |
CAT Score Shortlisting |
Candidates must meet
minimum overall AND all three sectional percentile cutoffs (VARC, DILR, QA).
Failing any one section = automatic disqualification. |
|
Stage 1 |
Shortlist Size
Consideration |
Actual shortlist depends on
applicant pool size, interview capacity, diversity targets; most candidates
meeting cutoffs historically receive PI calls |
|
Stage 2 |
Written Ability Test (WAT) |
Tests structured writing,
analytical thinking, clarity of argument, evidence-based reasoning |
|
Stage 2 |
Personal Interview (PI) |
Communication skills,
current affairs, career clarity, domain knowledge, personality fit, ability
to defend positions under pressure |
|
Stage 2 |
Composite Score |
Weighted aggregate of CAT +
PI + Academic/WE determines final merit list; admission offers typically
released AprilβMay |
|
CAP Note (2026β28) |
IIM Udaipur has opted out
of CAP and conducts independent PI-WAT with its own evaluation parameters and
schedule |
|
3.2 Final Composite Score
Weightage (2026β28 Batch)
|
Component |
Weightage (%) |
Notes |
|
CAT Score |
55% |
Normalized overall CAT
score β single most dominant factor at more than half of composite score |
|
Personal Interview (PI) |
25% |
Second largest factor;
critical differentiator among similarly-scored CAT candidates |
|
Academic Performance + Work
Experience |
20% |
Combined profile evaluation
β 10th, 12th, graduation marks + professional experience quality and duration |
|
Total |
100% |
Holistic evaluation β CAT
dominant but 45% determined by other factors |
3.3 Key Interpretation of
Weightage
|
Insight |
Implication for Aspirants |
|
CAT at 55% is the dominant
factor |
No other component can
fully compensate for a significantly weak CAT score; high percentile is
non-negotiable |
|
Remaining 45% beyond CAT is
substantial |
Candidates with strong PI +
academic profile can convert over those with marginally higher CAT but weak
profiles |
|
PI at 25% is decisive at
the margin |
Two candidates with similar
CAT scores β the one with stronger PI will almost always convert |
|
Academic+WE at 20% rewards
consistency |
Strong 10th, 12th, and
graduation marks throughout educational journey contribute meaningfully |
|
IIM Udaipur's CAT weightage
(55%) > IIM Kashipur (50%) |
Udaipur is slightly more
CAT-heavy; even stronger emphasis on achieving high percentile |
|
Independent process from
2026β28 |
No CAP; IIM Udaipur
controls its own shortlisting, PI-WAT scheduling, and merit list preparation |
3.4 Academic Profile
Evaluation
|
Academic Level |
Strong Profile |
Average Profile |
Weak Profile |
|
10th Standard |
90%+ |
80β89% |
Below 80% |
|
12th Standard |
90%+ |
80β89% |
Below 80% |
|
Graduation |
8.0+ CGPA / 75%+ |
7.0β7.9 CGPA / 65β74% |
Below 7.0 CGPA / below 65% |
|
Impact |
Maximizes 20% academic+WE
component |
Moderate contribution |
Partially offset by
excellent CAT + PI |
3.5 Work Experience Impact
|
Work Experience |
Impact on Admission |
|
0 years (Fresher) |
Eligible; WE component
score lower but academic performance can compensate within the 20% combined
component |
|
1β2 years |
Positive β early
professional exposure; strengthens 20% component |
|
2β4 years |
Optimal range; highest WE
evaluation score in composite formula |
|
5+ years |
Marginal disadvantage;
offset possible with strong CAT + academic profile |
|
Quality vs Duration |
Relevance and quality of
role in reputed organization matters alongside duration |
4. Two Types of Cutoffs β
Critical Distinction
|
Type |
Definition |
Who It Affects |
Typical Range (General, 2025) |
|
Qualifying Cutoff (Stage 1) |
Minimum CAT percentile to
receive PI-WAT shortlist call β published officially before admission cycle |
All applicants in each
category |
94 overall; 73 sectionals |
|
Final Admission Cutoff
(Stage 2) |
Actual minimum CAT
percentile at which a candidate received and accepted a final admission offer
after all stages |
Only final admitted
students |
Typically 2β4+ points above
qualifying |
|
Gap Between Both |
Final admission cutoff
exceeds qualifying cutoff due to composite score competition among all
shortlisted candidates |
Critical for realistic
target-setting |
Aim 3β5 points above
published qualifying cutoff |
Note: This article provides
both sets of data. Qualifying cutoffs = first filter. Final admission
percentiles = realistic minimum targets for actual admission.
5. Year-wise CAT Qualifying
Cutoffs (2019β2025) β RTI Data
5.1 General Category β
Year-wise Qualifying Cutoffs
|
Academic Year (Batch) |
Overall %ile |
VARC %ile |
DILR %ile |
QA %ile |
Change (Overall) |
|
2019β21 |
90 |
70 |
70 |
70 |
β (Baseline) |
|
2020β22 |
92 |
72 |
72 |
72 |
+2 points |
|
2021β23 |
95 |
75 |
75 |
75 |
+3 points (sharpest jump) |
|
2022β24 |
95 |
75 |
75 |
75 |
No change |
|
2023β25 |
94 |
73 |
73 |
73 |
-1 point (minor moderation) |
|
2024β26 |
95 |
73 |
73 |
73 |
+1 point |
|
2025β27 |
94 |
73 |
73 |
73 |
-1 point |
5.2 Key Observations β
General Category Cutoff Trend
|
Observation |
Data Evidence |
Implication for Aspirants |
|
Significant upward movement
over 6 years |
90 (2019β21) β 94β95
(recent cycles); +4β5 points overall |
Target 97+ percentile for
safe shortlisting buffer |
|
Sharpest jump in 2021β23 |
Cutoff moved from 92 to 95
in a single cycle β highest single-year increase |
Reflects rapid brand
growth; trend unlikely to reverse |
|
Stability at 94β95 since
2021 |
Oscillates between 94 and
95 across recent 4 cycles |
Competition has matured at
high level; expect 94β96 range to continue |
|
Sectional moderation from
75 to 73 |
Sectionals eased from 75
(2021β24) to 73 (2023β27) |
Slight relief in sectional
burden but overall still extremely competitive |
|
Consistent dual-threshold
enforcement |
Both overall AND sectional
must be cleared independently |
Never neglect any section;
balanced prep is mandatory |
6. Category-wise CAT
Qualifying Cutoffs (Latest Cycle β 2025β27)
|
Category |
Overall %ile |
VARC %ile |
DILR %ile |
QA %ile |
|
General |
94 |
73 |
73 |
73 |
|
EWS |
80 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
|
NC-OBC |
80 |
55 |
55 |
55 |
|
SC |
60 |
50 |
50 |
50 |
|
ST |
40 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
|
PwD |
40 |
30 |
30 |
30 |
6.1 Category-wise Cutoffs β
Multi-Year Comparison
|
Category |
2019β21 |
2021β23 |
2022β24 |
2023β25 |
2024β26 |
2025β27 |
|
General (Overall) |
90 |
95 |
95 |
94 |
95 |
94 |
|
General (Sectional) |
70 |
75 |
75 |
73 |
73 |
73 |
|
EWS (Overall) |
75 |
78 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
|
NC-OBC (Overall) |
75 |
78 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
|
SC (Overall) |
55 |
58 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
60 |
|
ST (Overall) |
35 |
38 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
|
PwD (Overall) |
35 |
38 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
40 |
6.2 Category Gap Analysis
(vs General, 2025β27)
|
Category |
Overall %ile |
Gap from General (Overall) |
Sectional Gap from General |
|
General |
94 |
β |
β |
|
EWS |
80 |
-14 points |
-13 points per section |
|
NC-OBC |
80 |
-14 points |
-18 points per section |
|
SC |
60 |
-34 points |
-23 points per section |
|
ST |
40 |
-54 points |
-43 points per section |
|
PwD |
40 |
-54 points |
-43 points per section |
Note: Differential cutoffs
follow Government of India reservation norms applicable to all centrally funded
IIMs.
7. Sectional Cutoff
Enforcement β Why It Is Eliminatory
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Rule |
Candidates must
independently clear VARC, DILR, AND QA sectional cutoffs alongside the
overall cutoff |
|
Consequence of failure |
Automatic Stage 1
disqualification regardless of overall percentile β no exceptions |
|
Example scenario |
Candidate scoring 98
overall but 70 in DILR (below 73 cutoff) = eliminated at Stage 1 despite
near-perfect overall score |
|
Strategic implication |
Never sacrifice any section
to maximize another; balanced, consistent preparation across all three
sections is non-negotiable |
|
Historical pattern |
Sectionals fluctuated
between 70β75 %ile; currently at 73 for General β strictly enforced in all
years |
7.1 Section-wise Preparation
Strategy
|
Section |
What It Tests |
Common Mistake |
Recommended Approach |
|
VARC |
Reading comprehension,
verbal reasoning, grammar, para-jumbles |
Rushing RC passages;
skipping grammar |
Daily long-form reading; RC
with strict timer; grammar drills |
|
DILR |
Data interpretation,
logical sets, puzzles, complex arrangements |
Wasting time on very hard
sets |
Learn triage β skip hard
sets; maximize speed+accuracy on medium sets |
|
QA |
Arithmetic, algebra,
geometry, number theory, modern math |
Over-focusing on advanced
topics |
Master fundamentals; speed
+ accuracy on Class 10β12 level concepts first |
8. Composite Score &
Final Admission Percentile Trends
8.1 General Category β
Actual Minimum Admitted CAT Percentile (RTI Insights)
|
Academic Year |
Qualifying Cutoff (Gen) |
Approx. Lowest Admitted %ile (Gen) |
Gap (Admitted vs Qualifying) |
|
2019β21 |
90 |
~92β93 |
+2β3 points |
|
2020β22 |
92 |
~93β94 |
+1β2 points |
|
2021β23 |
95 |
~96β97 |
+1β2 points |
|
2022β24 |
95 |
~96β97 |
+1β2 points |
|
2023β25 |
94 |
~95β96 |
+1β2 points |
|
2024β26 |
95 |
~96β97 |
+1β2 points |
|
2025β27 |
94 |
~95β97 |
+1β3 points |
8.2 Why Actual Admission
Percentile Exceeds Qualifying Cutoff
|
Factor |
Explanation |
|
Composite score competition |
Among all shortlisted
candidates above qualifying cutoff, only those with highest composite scores
(CAT+PI+Academic) get final offers |
|
Strong applicant pool |
Candidates shortlisted at
94+ general cutoff typically have strong academics and WE, raising the
effective floor |
|
PI performance filters
further |
Even candidates just above
qualifying cutoff may not convert if PI performance is weak (25% weightage) |
|
Safe target recommendation |
Target 97β98 percentile for
comfortable General category conversion at IIM Udaipur |
|
Category-wise safe targets |
EWS: 85β87 | NC-OBC: 85β87
| SC: 65β68 | ST: 48β52 | PwD: 48β52 |
9. PI & WAT Performance
β Impact on Conversion
|
Metric |
Details / RTI-Based Observation |
|
PI weightage |
25% of composite β second
largest single factor after CAT |
|
WAT weightage |
Part of the combined
evaluation structure; rewards structured analytical writing |
|
PI evaluation criteria |
Communication clarity,
domain knowledge, current affairs, career goal articulation, personality,
stress handling, ability to defend views |
|
WAT evaluation criteria |
Argument structure,
analytical depth, evidence quality, language clarity, conciseness within word
limit |
|
High CAT + Weak PI risk |
Candidates with 97β99
percentile have failed to convert due to poor PI articulation or
overconfidence |
|
Moderate CAT + Strong PI
opportunity |
Candidates slightly above
qualifying cutoff (94β96) can convert with exceptional PI (above 80% PI
score) |
|
Preparation priority |
PI prep should begin 2β3
months before interviews; cover current affairs, business news, own profile,
industry knowledge |
10. Diversity & Profile
Factors β Impact on Admission
|
Diversity Factor |
Category |
Impact |
|
Academic Diversity |
Non-engineers (Commerce,
Arts, Science, Law) |
Positive consideration
within profile component; may convert at marginally lower composite score
than engineers |
|
Gender Diversity |
Female candidates |
Positive weightage within
profile component; helps in borderline cases; does not override CAT dominance
at 55% |
|
Work Experience Quality |
All categories |
Relevant roles in reputed
organizations score higher; 2β4 years optimal; freshers not disqualified but
at mild disadvantage in WE sub-component |
|
International Accreditation
Impact |
All candidates |
AACSB + AMBA accreditations
attract more serious, globally-oriented candidates; raises overall applicant
quality |
|
Rajasthan / Regional
Diversity |
All candidates |
Not a published formal
criterion; IIM Udaipur selects nationally |
11. IIM Udaipur vs Peer IIMs
β Comparative Analysis (2025)
|
IIM |
Gen Qualifying Cutoff |
Approx. Gen Admission %ile |
Annual Intake |
Avg Package (LPA) |
Accreditation |
Selection Strictness |
|
IIM Udaipur |
94 |
~96β97 |
~250 |
~17 |
AACSB + AMBA |
Very High |
|
IIM Kashipur |
92 |
~94.8 |
~210β240 |
~16β18 |
None listed |
High |
|
IIM Raipur |
90 |
~93.5 |
~210 |
~15β17 |
None listed |
High |
|
IIM Ranchi |
90 |
~93.5 |
~200β220 |
~16β17 |
None listed |
High |
|
IIM Tiruchirappalli |
90 |
~93.5 |
~200 |
~15β16 |
None listed |
High |
|
IIM Rohtak |
89 |
~92.5 |
~200 |
~13β15 |
None listed |
Moderate-High |
|
IIM Bodh Gaya |
90 |
~92.15 |
~140 |
~12β14 |
None listed |
Moderate-High |
|
IIM Shillong |
93 |
~95+ |
~180 |
~16β18 |
None listed |
High |
Note: IIM Udaipur has the
highest qualifying cutoff (94) among second-generation IIMs in 2025 and is the
only second-gen IIM with dual international accreditation (AACSB + AMBA).
12. IIM Tier Positioning β
Where IIM Udaipur Stands
|
Tier |
IIMs Included |
Gen Qualifying Cutoff Range |
Key Differentiator |
|
Top-3 |
IIMA, IIMB, IIMC |
99+ |
Decades of legacy, alumni
network, global brand |
|
Old IIMs |
IIML, IIMK, IIMI |
95β97 |
15β30 years reputation;
strong placements |
|
New IIM β Premium |
IIM Udaipur, IIM Shillong |
93β95 |
Fastest-growing new IIMs;
international accreditation; rapidly improving brand |
|
New IIM β Competitive |
IIM Kashipur, IIM Raipur,
IIM Ranchi |
90β92 |
Good placement growth;
accessible to 90β93 scorers |
|
New IIM β Growing |
IIM Rohtak, IIM Udaipur
(early) |
88β90 |
Building reputation; lower
barriers |
|
Baby IIMs |
Newest campuses |
85β88 |
Lowest barriers; newest
infrastructure |
13. Target Percentile
Strategy for CAT 2025 Aspirants
|
Category |
Qualifying Cutoff (2025β27) |
Approx. Admission Min |
Safe Target |
Comfortable Target |
|
General |
94 |
~96β97 |
97β98 |
99+ |
|
EWS |
80 |
~83β85 |
85β87 |
90+ |
|
NC-OBC |
80 |
~83β85 |
85β87 |
88+ |
|
SC |
60 |
~63β66 |
66β68 |
72+ |
|
ST |
40 |
~43β46 |
48β52 |
55+ |
|
PwD |
40 |
~42β45 |
48β52 |
55+ |
13.1 Decision Matrix β CAT
Score vs Conversion Probability
|
CAT %ile (Gen) |
Shortlist Probability |
Conversion Probability |
Strategy Recommended |
|
99+ |
Very High |
Very High (if PI strong) |
Prioritize PI-WAT prep; IIM
Udaipur is a strong fit |
|
97β98.9 |
Very High |
High (PI critical) |
Strong PI mandatory; IIM
Udaipur realistic target |
|
95β96.9 |
High |
ModerateβHigh |
PI must be exceptional;
apply to IIM Udaipur + peer IIMs |
|
94β94.9 |
ModerateβHigh |
LowβModerate (PI decisive) |
Right at qualifying
threshold; needs outstanding composite score |
|
92β93.9 |
LowβModerate |
Very Low |
Below current qualifying
cutoff; target peer second-gen IIMs |
|
Below 92 |
Negligible |
Negligible |
Below qualifying for most
second-gen IIMs; retake or target lower-tier |
14. Six-Year Trend Summary
& 2026 Projections
|
Parameter |
2019β21 |
2021β23 |
2023β25 |
2025β27 |
2026β28 Projection |
|
Gen Qualifying Cutoff |
90 |
95 |
94 |
94 |
94β96 |
|
Gen Sectional Cutoff |
70 |
75 |
73 |
73 |
73β75 |
|
Approx. Gen Admission Min |
~92β93 |
~96β97 |
~95β96 |
~95β97 |
~96β98 |
|
Admission Process |
CAP (shared) |
CAP (shared) |
CAP (shared) |
CAP (shared) |
Independent (opted out) |
|
Annual Intake |
~150β180 |
~200β220 |
~240β250 |
~250 |
~250β270 |
14.1 Impact of CAP Opt-Out
on 2026β28 Admissions
|
Aspect |
Under CAP (Previous) |
Independent Process (2026β28) |
|
PI-WAT scheduling |
Common schedule coordinated
across CAP IIMs |
IIM Udaipur schedules
independently; no conflict with other IIMs |
|
Shortlisting criteria |
Broadly similar across CAP
IIMs |
IIM Udaipur applies its own
institute-specific criteria and thresholds |
|
Weightage formula |
Varied by IIM within CAP |
IIM Udaipur's own formula:
CAT 55% + PI 25% + Academic+WE 20% |
|
Merit list |
Each IIM prepared
independently even under CAP |
Same β IIM Udaipur prepares
its own final merit list |
|
Impact on aspirants |
Interview called commonly;
could be evaluated by multiple IIMs simultaneously |
Must apply to IIM Udaipur
specifically; interview call is IIM Udaipur-specific |
|
Strategic implication |
Monitor IIM Udaipur's
official 2026β28 admission notification for updated criteria and schedule |
|
15. Common Misconceptions β
Clarified with RTI Data
|
Myth |
Reality (RTI-based) |
|
94 percentile guarantees
IIM Udaipur admission |
94 is the qualifying
threshold (Stage 1 only). Actual admitted candidates score 95β97+ due to
composite score competition. Qualifying β admission. |
|
High CAT score alone
ensures conversion |
PI carries 25% weightage.
Candidates with 98β99 percentile have failed to convert due to poor interview
performance. CAT is dominant but not sufficient. |
|
Sectional cutoffs are
secondary to overall score |
Sectionals are eliminatory.
A candidate scoring 99 overall but 70 in VARC (below 73 cutoff) is
disqualified at Stage 1. No exceptions. |
|
AACSB accreditation doesn't
matter for domestic jobs |
AACSB accreditation
validates curriculum quality, faculty credentials, and research output β
directly improving education quality and global recruiter trust. |
|
CAP opt-out means lower
standards |
IIM Udaipur opted out of
CAP to exercise greater autonomy in candidate selection β a sign of
institutional confidence and maturity, not a lowering of standards. |
|
Freshers have no chance |
Freshers are eligible and
do secure admission. WE is one element within the 20% combined component.
Strong CAT + academics can fully compensate. |
|
Non-engineers are
disadvantaged |
Academic diversity is
positively valued. Non-engineers may convert at marginally lower composite
scores due to diversity weightage within the profile component. |
16. Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs)
|
# |
Question |
Answer |
|
1 |
What is the minimum CAT
percentile for IIM Udaipur (2025)? |
Qualifying cutoff for
2025β27 batch: General β 94 overall, 73 sectional. Actual minimum of admitted
candidates: approximately 95β97 for General. Safe preparation target: 97β98+
overall. |
|
2 |
Can I get IIM Udaipur with
94 percentile? |
94 meets the qualifying
threshold for General category. However, actual admitted candidates score
95β97+. A 94 percentile General category candidate needs an outstanding PI
(80%+) and exceptional academic profile for any conversion chance. |
|
3 |
What is CAP and why has IIM
Udaipur opted out of it? |
CAP (Common Admission
Process) was a shared PI-WAT process among select IIMs. IIM Udaipur has opted
out for the 2026β28 batch to conduct its own independent selection process,
reflecting its institutional maturity and desire for autonomy in candidate
evaluation. |
|
4 |
What is IIM Udaipur's
composite score formula? |
CAT Score: 55% | Personal
Interview: 25% | Academic Performance + Work Experience: 20%. CAT is the
dominant factor at 55%, but the remaining 45% creates meaningful scope for
profile differentiation. |
|
5 |
How important is PI for IIM
Udaipur? |
PI carries 25% weightage β
the second largest factor. Candidates at 94β96 percentile with exceptional PI
performance (80%+) have converted, while 98β99 percentile candidates with
poor PI have not. PI preparation is non-negotiable. |
|
6 |
Do sectional cutoffs matter
at IIM Udaipur? |
Yes β they are eliminatory.
All three sections (VARC, DILR, QA) must independently clear 73 percentile
for General category. Failing even one section = automatic disqualification
regardless of overall percentile. No exceptions. |
|
7 |
What international
accreditations does IIM Udaipur hold? |
IIM Udaipur holds both
AACSB (Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business) and AMBA
(Association of MBAs, UK) accreditations β dual accreditation held by fewer
than 5β6% of business schools globally. |
|
8 |
What is the safe target CAT
percentile for EWS/OBC candidates? |
EWS: 85β87 safe; 90+
comfortable. NC-OBC: 85β87 safe; 88+ comfortable. These build meaningful
buffers above qualifying (80) and estimated admission minimums (83β85). |
|
9 |
Is work experience
mandatory for IIM Udaipur? |
No. Work experience is part
of the combined 20% academic+WE component. Freshers are eligible and
admitted. Strong CAT score and consistent academic record can compensate for
absence of WE within the composite score formula. |
|
10 |
How does IIM Udaipur
compare to other second-gen IIMs? |
IIM Udaipur has the highest
qualifying cutoff (94) among second-generation IIMs in 2025 and is the only
second-gen IIM with dual AACSB + AMBA accreditation. Its placement outcomes
(avg 17 LPA) and brand perception are among the strongest in this group. |
|
11 |
Does gender diversity help
female candidates at IIM Udaipur? |
Female candidates receive
positive consideration within the 20% profile component (academic diversity +
diversity factors). This provides a marginal advantage in borderline cases
but does not override CAT's dominant 55% weightage. |
|
12 |
What was the sharpest
cutoff increase at IIM Udaipur? |
The sharpest single-cycle
jump was from 92 (2020β22) to 95 (2021β23) β a 3 percentile point increase in
one year, reflecting rapid brand growth and larger high-quality applicant
pools. |
|
13 |
What CAT percentile trend
is expected for 2026β28? |
Based on current
trajectory, General qualifying cutoff expected at 94β96. Actual admission
minimum expected at 96β98. Competition expected to remain very high given
independent process and improving brand. |
|
14 |
Is RTI data reliable for
IIM Udaipur admissions? |
RTI data is the most
reliable source available. It is legally mandated, institution-verified, and
extracted from official records. However, it typically shows minimum
percentiles (exceptional admitted candidates), not median or average figures.
Most admitted students score higher. |
|
15 |
What are important WAT
topics for IIM Udaipur? |
WAT evaluates analytical
writing on business, social, and current affairs topics. Important areas
include economic policy, technology & society, sustainability,
geopolitics, and business ethics. Practice writing 200β250 word structured
essays within 15 minutes with clear argument, evidence, and conclusion. |
17. SEO Keywords β High
Volume & Relevant (100+ Keywords)
Primary Keywords
|
Keyword |
Est. Monthly Volume |
Difficulty |
|
IIM Udaipur CAT cutoff |
10,000β14,000 |
Medium-High |
|
IIM Udaipur minimum
percentile |
7,000β9,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur RTI data |
1,200β1,800 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur admission 2025 |
14,000β18,000 |
High |
|
CAT percentile for IIM
Udaipur |
6,000β8,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur MBA admission |
8,000β11,000 |
Medium-High |
|
IIM Udaipur selection
criteria |
3,500β5,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur category-wise
cutoff |
3,000β4,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur 2025 cutoff |
10,000β14,000 |
High |
|
IIM Udaipur CAP opt out
2026 |
2,000β3,000 |
Low |
Secondary Keywords
|
Keyword |
Est. Monthly Volume |
Difficulty |
|
IIM Udaipur General
category cutoff |
2,000β2,800 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur EWS cutoff |
1,000β1,400 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur OBC cutoff |
1,200β1,700 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur SC ST cutoff |
900β1,300 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur sectional
cutoff |
1,200β1,700 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur WAT PI
weightage |
800β1,200 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur admission
process |
4,000β6,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur placement
report 2025 |
6,000β8,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur AACSB AMBA
accreditation |
2,000β3,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur composite score
formula |
700β1,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur vs other IIMs |
2,000β3,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur independent
admission 2026 |
1,500β2,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur work experience
weightage |
500β700 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur interview tips |
900β1,300 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur Rajasthan
campus |
2,000β3,000 |
Low |
Long-tail Keywords
|
Long-tail Keyword |
Est. Monthly Volume |
Difficulty |
|
minimum CAT percentile to
get into IIM Udaipur |
1,400β2,000 |
Low |
|
RTI data IIM Udaipur
minimum score category wise |
400β600 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur CAT cutoff year
wise 2019 to 2025 |
600β850 |
Very Low |
|
can I get IIM Udaipur call
with 94 percentile |
800β1,200 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur qualifying vs
final admission cutoff difference |
350β550 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur vs IIM Kashipur
cutoff comparison |
700β1,000 |
Very Low |
|
how to convert IIM Udaipur
PI tips 2025 |
600β850 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur SC category
minimum CAT percentile RTI |
300β450 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur CAP opt out
impact on admission 2026 |
500β700 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur composite score
55 percent CAT explained |
400β600 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur AACSB
accreditation benefits MBA students |
600β900 |
Low |
|
female candidate advantage
IIM Udaipur admission |
350β500 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Udaipur sectional
cutoff VARC DILR QA 73 percentile |
300β450 |
Very Low |
|
lowest CAT score admitted
IIM Udaipur RTI 2024 |
500β700 |
Very Low |
|
is 97 percentile safe for
IIM Udaipur general category |
700β1,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur placement
average highest salary 2025 |
4,000β6,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur 300 acre campus
Balicha Udaipur |
1,000β1,500 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur vs IIM Shillong
which is better 2025 |
1,500β2,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Udaipur 2026
independent admission process changes |
700β1,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Udaipur WAT topics
preparation strategy 2025 |
600β850 |
Very Low |
Question-Based / PAA
Keywords (People Also Ask)
|
Search Query |
Type |
Est. Volume |
|
What is IIM Udaipur cutoff
2025? |
Informational |
5,000β7,000 |
|
How much percentile is
required for IIM Udaipur? |
Informational |
4,000β6,000 |
|
Is 94 percentile enough for
IIM Udaipur? |
Comparison |
1,800β2,500 |
|
What is CAP and does IIM
Udaipur still participate? |
Informational |
2,000β3,000 |
|
Does IIM Udaipur have AACSB
accreditation? |
Informational |
1,500β2,000 |
|
How is IIM Udaipur
placement 2025? |
Informational |
6,000β9,000 |
|
Is IIM Udaipur worth
joining? |
Opinion/Comparison |
3,000β5,000 |
|
How to prepare for IIM
Udaipur PI? |
How-to |
2,000β2,800 |
|
Can fresher get into IIM
Udaipur? |
Informational |
1,000β1,400 |
|
IIM Udaipur fees structure
2025 |
Transactional |
5,000β7,000 |
|
IIM Udaipur vs IIM Kashipur
which is better? |
Comparison |
2,500β3,500 |
|
IIM Udaipur average salary
2024 2025 |
Informational |
6,000β8,000 |
|
IIM Udaipur campus life
hostel facilities |
Informational |
1,500β2,000 |
|
Is RTI data reliable for
IIM Udaipur admission? |
Informational |
400β600 |
|
Should I join IIM Udaipur
or IIM Shillong? |
Comparison |
1,200β1,800 |
Category & Comparison
Keywords
|
Keyword |
Type |
Est. Volume |
|
IIM Udaipur vs IIM Kashipur
cutoff comparison |
Comparison |
1,800β2,500 |
|
IIM Udaipur vs IIM Raipur
which is better |
Comparison |
1,200β1,800 |
|
IIM Udaipur vs IIM Rohtak
cutoff |
Comparison |
1,000β1,400 |
|
second generation IIM
cutoff comparison 2025 |
Comparison |
2,500β3,500 |
|
IIM Udaipur PwD cutoff RTI |
Category |
250β400 |
|
IIM Udaipur non-engineering
advantage admission |
Category |
400β600 |
|
IIM Udaipur for commerce
students |
Category |
600β900 |
|
IIM Udaipur for engineers
vs non-engineers chances |
Category |
700β1,000 |
|
IIM Udaipur 2026 cutoff
prediction independent process |
Year-specific |
1,500β2,000 |
|
IIM Udaipur historical
cutoff trend 2019β2025 |
Year-specific |
600β850 |
|
IIM Udaipur WAT topics 2025 |
Process |
800β1,200 |
|
IIM Udaipur PI questions
asked experience |
Process |
1,000β1,500 |
|
IIM Udaipur alumni network
strength global |
Informational |
1,000β1,400 |
|
IIM Udaipur Rajasthan
tourism location advantage |
Informational |
800β1,200 |
|
IIM Udaipur top recruiters
list 2024 2025 |
Informational |
2,500β3,500 |
Data Disclaimer &
Sources
|
Item |
Details |
|
Primary Source |
RTI responses filed with
IIM Udaipur Admission Office |
|
Secondary Sources |
InsideIIM, MBAUniverse,
PaGaLGuY, official IIM Udaipur prospectus and admission notifications |
|
Qualifying Cutoff Data |
Official qualifying cutoffs
published by IIM Udaipur in official admission notifications |
|
Final Admission Percentile |
Approximate minimums based
on RTI data; most admitted students score significantly higher than minimums |
|
Composite Score Note |
55% CAT + 25% PI + 20%
Academic+WE is based on latest available cycle; verify via official 2026β28
notification |
|
CAP Opt-Out Note |
IIM Udaipur's independent
process for 2026β28 was announced; aspirants must verify updated criteria and
schedule from official source |
|
Projection Note |
2026β28 cutoff projections
are trend-based estimates, not official data |
|
No Affiliation |
This article is not
affiliated with IIM Udaipur, any IIM network body, or any coaching institute |