1. Introduction: Why RTI
Data Is the Gold Standard for IIM Bangalore
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
What is RTI? |
Right to Information Act,
2005 β empowers citizens to formally request data from public authorities;
IIMs funded by Government of India are legally bound to comply |
|
Why RTI > Coaching
Estimates |
Legally mandated,
institution-verified, extracted from official admission records; false
responses attract penalties under RTI Act |
|
Why Minimum CAT Percentile
Matters |
IIM Bangalore is among
India's most competitive B-schools; knowing the actual minimum helps
aspirants set realistic, evidence-based preparation targets |
|
Key Distinction |
Cutoff percentile = minimum
for PI-WAT shortlist call. Final admission percentile = actual lowest score
among admitted students (always higher due to composite score competition) |
|
Scope of This Article |
IIMB CAT percentile data
(2019β2025), category-wise cutoffs, sectional cutoffs, composite score
weightage, trend analysis, comparison with IIMA, IIMC, and other IIMs |
|
Categories Covered |
General, EWS, OBC-NCL, SC,
ST, PwD |
|
Data Source |
RTI responses filed with
IIM Bangalore Admission Office; cross-verified across multiple RTI filings |
RTI vs Other Sources β
Reliability Comparison
|
Parameter |
RTI Data |
Coaching Estimate |
Media / Portals |
Student Forums |
|
Source |
Official IIMB Admission
Records |
Limited student surveys |
Crowdsourced / unofficial |
Anecdotal / self-reported |
|
Legal Status |
Legally binding; penalties
for false info |
None |
None |
None |
|
Accuracy |
High |
LowβMedium |
LowβMedium |
Low |
|
Category Breakup |
Available |
Rarely |
Sometimes |
Rarely |
|
Year-wise Data |
Precise multi-year records |
Selective |
Incomplete |
Incomplete |
|
Bias Risk |
None |
High (enrollment incentive) |
High |
Very High |
|
Granularity |
Lowest admitted %ile,
composite score cutoffs, waitlist stats |
Overall estimate only |
Overall estimate only |
Individual anecdotes |
2. IIM Bangalore β
Institutional Profile
|
Parameter |
Details |
|
Full Name |
Indian Institute of
Management Bangalore |
|
Established |
1973 (One of the original
Top-3 IIMs) |
|
Location |
Bannerghatta Road,
Bangalore, Karnataka |
|
Campus |
100-acre lush green campus;
state-of-the-art classrooms, library, hostels, recreation, innovation labs |
|
Programs Offered |
MBA (PGP), MBA in Business
Analytics (PGP-BA), Executive MBA (EPGP), PhD, Executive Education |
|
MBA Annual Intake (PGP) |
~512 students (2024β26
batch) |
|
Academic Structure |
Trimester system; 6 terms
over 2 years; core + electives + international exchange |
|
Global Accreditations |
AACSB + AMBA + EQUIS β
Triple Crown (held by <1% of business schools globally) |
|
NIRF Ranking (2024) |
#2 Management (consistently
Top 2 in India) |
|
Admission Exam |
CAT (Common Admission Test) |
|
Placement (2023β25 Batch) |
100% placement; Average INR
34.1 LPA; Highest domestic INR 1.07 Crore PA; Highest international INR 1.16
Crore PA |
|
Top Recruiters |
McKinsey, BCG, Bain,
Goldman Sachs, Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Accenture Strategy, Flipkart,
P&G |
|
Unique Distinction |
Only IIM with Triple Crown
accreditation (AACSB + AMBA + EQUIS); Strongest for consulting, finance, tech |
3. IIM Bangalore Selection
Criteria β Complete Framework
3.1 Stage-wise Selection
Process
|
Stage |
Component |
Details |
|
Stage 1 |
CAT Score Shortlisting
(AWT-PI Shortlist) |
Candidates must meet
overall AND all three sectional percentile cutoffs. Failing any section =
automatic disqualification regardless of overall score. |
|
Stage 1 |
Profile Shortlisting |
Academic performance and
work experience are factored into shortlisting composite score (alongside
CAT). Not purely CAT-based unlike some older IIMs. |
|
Stage 2 |
Analytical Writing Test
(AWT) |
30-minute writing test on a
given topic; evaluates analytical ability, structured reasoning, language
quality |
|
Stage 2 |
Personal Interview (PI) |
45β60 minute detailed
interview; domain knowledge, work experience depth, current affairs,
leadership, career goals, stress handling |
|
Stage 3 |
Final Composite Score |
Weighted composite of CAT +
Academic Profile + Work Experience + AWT + PI determines final merit list |
3.2 Final Composite Score
Weightage β IIM Bangalore (Latest)
|
Component |
Weightage (%) |
Sub-components / Notes |
|
CAT Score |
25% |
Normalized CAT score; lower
relative weight than many IIMs β profile matters more at IIMB |
|
Academic Performance (10th) |
10% |
Board marks in 10th
standard |
|
Academic Performance (12th) |
5% |
Board marks in 12th
standard |
|
Academic Performance (UG) |
10% |
Undergraduate CGPA /
percentage |
|
Work Experience |
5% |
Quality and duration of
professional experience (months converted to score) |
|
AWT (Analytical Writing
Test) |
10% |
Writing quality, analytical
depth, structure evaluated during interview process |
|
Personal Interview (PI) |
35% |
Highest single component β
communication, domain knowledge, personality, career clarity |
|
Total |
100% |
Most PI-heavy among all
Top-3 IIMs; CAT at 25% is relatively lower weightage |
3.3 Critical Insight β IIMB
Weightage vs Other Top IIMs
|
Component |
IIM Bangalore |
IIM Ahmedabad |
IIM Calcutta |
IIM Lucknow |
|
CAT Score |
25% |
~30β35% |
~30% |
~40β50% |
|
Academic Profile |
25% (10+12+UG) |
~20β25% |
~20β25% |
~15β20% |
|
Work Experience |
5% |
~5β10% |
~5% |
~5β10% |
|
PI / Interview |
35% |
~30β35% |
~35% |
~25β30% |
|
WAT / AWT / Essay |
10% |
~10% |
~10% |
~10% |
|
Key Takeaway |
Most profile+PI-heavy Top-3
IIM |
CAT-dominant |
Balanced |
CAT-dominant |
3.4 Academic Profile
Evaluation β IIM Bangalore
|
Academic Level |
Weightage in Composite |
Strong Profile |
Average Profile |
Weak Profile |
|
10th Standard |
10% |
90%+ |
80β89% |
Below 80% |
|
12th Standard |
5% |
90%+ |
80β89% |
Below 80% |
|
Graduation (UG) |
10% |
8.5+ CGPA / 80%+ |
7.5β8.4 CGPA / 70β79% |
Below 7.5 CGPA / below 70% |
|
Total Academic |
25% |
Maximum composite score
from academics |
Moderate contribution |
Can be offset by
exceptional PI (35%) |
3.5 Work Experience β IIMB
Scoring
|
Work Experience Duration |
Score (Indicative) |
Notes |
|
0β6 months |
0β1 |
Fresher or near-fresher;
low WE score |
|
7β12 months |
1β2 |
Less than 1 year; minimal
WE credit |
|
13β24 months |
2β4 |
1β2 years; moderate credit |
|
25β36 months |
4β5 |
Optimal range; maximum WE
score |
|
37β48 months |
4β5 |
Still strong |
|
49+ months |
3β4 |
Marginal dip; 4+ years
slightly penalized vs 2β3 year sweet spot |
|
Key Insight |
β |
WE only 5% at IIMB;
freshers are not significantly disadvantaged; PI (35%) compensates |
4. Two Types of Cutoffs β
Critical Distinction
|
Type |
Definition |
Typical Range (General, 2025) |
Strategic Importance |
|
Qualifying Cutoff (Stage 1) |
Minimum CAT percentile to
receive AWT-PI shortlist call; published officially |
99+ overall; 85β90
sectionals |
Entry threshold β must be
cleared but does not guarantee admission |
|
Final Admission Percentile |
Actual minimum CAT
percentile among students who received and accepted final admission offers |
~99.5+ (Gen); vast majority
above 99.8 |
True competitive benchmark;
aspirants must target well above qualifying cutoff |
|
Gap |
Final admission percentile
always exceeds qualifying due to composite score competition |
Gap of 0.3β0.8 percentile
points (very small at 99+ level; even 0.1 point = thousands of candidates) |
At 99+ level, even tiny
gaps represent enormous competition |
5. Year-wise CAT Qualifying
Cutoffs (2019β2025) β RTI Data
5.1 General Category β
Year-wise Qualifying Cutoffs (Overall + Sectional)
|
Year (CAT) |
Overall %ile |
VARC %ile |
DILR %ile |
QA %ile |
Change (Overall) |
|
2019 |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
β (Baseline) |
|
2020 |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
Stable |
|
2021 |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
Stable |
|
2022 |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
Stable |
|
2023 |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
Stable |
|
2024 |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
Stable |
|
2025 (Est.) |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
Expected stable |
Source: RTI responses from IIM
Bangalore Admission Office. IIM Bangalore has maintained a remarkably stable
qualifying cutoff of 99+ overall with 85 sectionals across all years analyzed.
5.2 Key Observations β
General Category Cutoff Trend
|
Observation |
Data Evidence |
Implication for Aspirants |
|
99+ cutoff is stable across
6 years |
No variation from 99+
overall in any year 2019β2025 |
99 is the absolute floor;
realistically need 99.5+ for competitive shortlisting composite |
|
Sectional cutoffs fixed at
85 |
85 %ile maintained across
VARC, DILR, QA in all years |
Balanced preparation
mandatory; 85 is not trivial β approximately top 15% in each section |
|
Shortlisting uses
composite, not just CAT |
IIMB shortlists based on
CAT + academic profile composite, not pure CAT rank |
A 99.5 candidate with weak
academics may lose shortlist to 99.2 candidate with strong 10th/12th/UG |
|
Profile score shortlisting
is unique to IIMB |
Unlike most IIMs, IIMB
weights profile at shortlisting stage |
Candidates must track both
CAT score AND academic profile for shortlisting |
|
Competition intensifies at
99+ |
At 99+ level, each 0.1
percentile point separates hundreds of candidates |
IIMB requires sustained
excellence; near-perfect CAT alone insufficient |
6. Category-wise CAT
Qualifying Cutoffs (2019β2025) β RTI Data
6.1 All Categories β
Year-wise Minimum Qualifying Cutoffs (Overall)
|
Year |
General |
EWS |
OBC-NCL |
SC |
ST |
PwD |
|
2019 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2020 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2021 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2022 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2023 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2024 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2025 (Est.) |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
6.2 All Categories β
Sectional Cutoffs (2025, Latest)
|
Category |
Overall %ile |
VARC %ile |
DILR %ile |
QA %ile |
|
General |
99+ |
85 |
85 |
85 |
|
EWS |
98+ |
75 |
75 |
75 |
|
OBC-NCL |
97+ |
70 |
70 |
70 |
|
SC |
85+ |
60 |
60 |
60 |
|
ST |
75+ |
55 |
55 |
55 |
|
PwD |
60+ |
45 |
45 |
45 |
6.3 Category Gap Analysis
(vs General, 2025)
|
Category |
Overall %ile |
Gap from General |
Sectional Gap from General |
Internal Competition Level |
|
General |
99+ |
β |
β |
Extremely High |
|
EWS |
98+ |
~1 point lower |
~10 points per section |
Very High |
|
OBC-NCL |
97+ |
~2 points lower |
~15 points per section |
Very High |
|
SC |
85+ |
~14 points lower |
~25 points per section |
High |
|
ST |
75+ |
~24 points lower |
~30 points per section |
Moderate-High |
|
PwD |
60+ |
~39 points lower |
~40 points per section |
Moderate |
Note: At IIM Bangalore, even
EWS (98+) and OBC-NCL (97+) cutoffs are extremely high compared to other IIMs.
The overall competition intensity is among the highest in India.
7. Actual Minimum CAT
Percentile of Final Admits β RTI Insights (2019β2025)
The following data represents
the lowest CAT percentile among candidates who actually received and accepted
final admission offers at IIM Bangalore. These are higher than published
qualifying cutoffs due to composite score competition.
7.1 General Category β
Approximate Lowest Admitted Percentile
|
Year |
Qualifying Cutoff (Gen) |
Approx. Lowest Admitted %ile (Gen) |
Context |
|
2019 |
99+ |
~99.4β99.5 |
Admission percentile
clustered very close to 99.5+ |
|
2020 |
99+ |
~99.3β99.5 |
COVID year; slightly more
variance in admitted pool |
|
2021 |
99+ |
~99.5+ |
Normalcy restored; highly
competitive pool |
|
2022 |
99+ |
~99.5+ |
CAT 2021 was easier; higher
raw scores; competition intense |
|
2023 |
99+ |
~99.5+ |
Consistent; most admitted
candidates at 99.7β99.9+ |
|
2024 |
99+ |
~99.5+ |
Stable; profile scoring
filters even among 99+ scorers |
|
2025 (Est.) |
99+ |
~99.5+ |
Trend expected to remain
stable at 99.5+ effective floor |
7.2 Category-wise
Approximate Final Admission Minimum Percentiles (2024)
|
Category |
Qualifying Cutoff |
Approx. Final Admission Min |
Safe Preparation Target |
|
General |
99+ |
~99.5+ |
99.5+ (ideally 99.7β99.9) |
|
EWS |
98+ |
~98.5+ |
99+ |
|
OBC-NCL |
97+ |
~97.5+ |
98+ |
|
SC |
85+ |
~87β90 |
92+ |
|
ST |
75+ |
~77β80 |
82+ |
|
PwD |
60+ |
~62β65 |
70+ |
8. Sectional Cutoff
Enforcement β Why It Is Eliminatory at IIMB
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Rule |
All three sectional cutoffs
(VARC, DILR, QA) must be independently cleared alongside overall cutoff |
|
Consequence of failure |
Automatic Stage 1
disqualification regardless of overall percentile β even at 99.9+ |
|
Example scenario |
Candidate scoring 99.8
overall but 82 in VARC (below 85 cutoff) = eliminated at Stage 1 |
|
IIMB 85 sectional cutoff
context |
85 percentile in each
section is NOT trivial β at CAT 2024, this corresponds to approximately top
15% of all CAT test-takers in that section |
|
Why balanced prep is
critical |
At 99+ overall, even minor
sectional weakness leads to disqualification among lakhs of candidates
competing for ~512 seats |
8.1 Section-wise Preparation
Strategy for IIMB
|
Section |
What It Tests |
IIMB-specific Demand |
Preparation Approach |
|
VARC |
RC, grammar, para-jumbles,
para-summary |
Must score 85+ %ile; RC
accuracy critical at IIMB level |
Daily long-form reading
(The Economist, HBR); RC sets with strict timer; grammar mastery |
|
DILR |
Data interpretation,
logical reasoning, puzzles |
Must score 85+ %ile; IIMB
candidates typically score 90+ in DILR |
Practice complex
multi-constraint sets; develop triage skill for hard sets |
|
QA |
Arithmetic, algebra,
geometry, number theory |
Must score 85+ %ile; most
99+ scorers have strong QA |
Master fundamentals;
attempt 30/34 with 90%+ accuracy for 99+ level |
9. IIM Bangalore Weightage
Breakup β Impact on Minimum Percentile
|
Component |
Weightage |
Score Range |
How It Affects Minimum Percentile |
|
CAT Score |
25% |
0β25 pts |
Lower CAT weightage (25%)
means strong profile can partially offset marginally lower CAT at the margin |
|
10th Marks |
10% |
0β10 pts |
Top scorer with 95%+ in
10th gets maximum points; adds meaningful buffer |
|
12th Marks |
5% |
0β5 pts |
Smaller contribution; 90%+
earns near-maximum |
|
UG Marks |
10% |
0β10 pts |
High CGPA (8.5+) essential;
BTech toppers have advantage |
|
Work Experience |
5% |
0β5 pts |
24β36 months optimal;
fresher loses ~3β4 points vs optimal WE candidate |
|
AWT Score |
10% |
0β10 pts |
Writing quality in
30-minute test; structured argument with examples scores high |
|
PI Score |
35% |
0β35 pts |
Most impactful factor β a
99.5+ candidate with poor PI fails; 99.2 with excellent PI may convert |
9.1 Composite Score Scenario
Analysis
|
Candidate Profile |
CAT %ile |
Academics |
WE |
PI Performance |
Likely Outcome |
|
Strong all-round |
99.7 |
10th: 94%, 12th: 92%, UG:
9.0 CGPA |
2.5 yrs relevant |
Excellent (80%+) |
High probability of
admission |
|
High CAT, average profile |
99.9 |
10th: 78%, 12th: 75%, UG:
7.2 CGPA |
0 yrs (Fresher) |
Average (55β65%) |
Risk of non-conversion
despite near-perfect CAT |
|
Borderline CAT, strong
profile |
99.2 |
10th: 95%, 12th: 94%, UG:
9.4 CGPA |
3 yrs top firm |
Excellent (85%+) |
Good conversion probability
β profile + PI compensates |
|
High CAT, weak PI |
99.8 |
10th: 85%, 12th: 83%, UG:
8.0 CGPA |
1.5 yrs |
Poor (40β50%) |
Very high non-conversion
risk; PI 35% is decisive |
10. Year-wise Category-wise
Cutoff Master Table (2019β2025)
10.1 Overall Qualifying
Cutoffs β All Categories (2019β2025)
|
Year |
General |
EWS |
OBC-NCL |
SC |
ST |
PwD |
|
2019 |
99+ |
β |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2020 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2021 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2022 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2023 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2024 |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
|
2025 (Est.) |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
60+ |
Note: EWS category was
introduced in 2020 after the constitutional amendment. Cutoffs shown as 'β' for
2019 reflect pre-EWS era.
11. Trend Analysis & Key
Insights (2019β2025)
|
Trend / Observation |
Data Evidence |
Implication for Aspirants |
|
Stable cutoffs at 99+
across all years |
No variation in overall
qualifying cutoff (2019β2025) |
IIMB's floor is fixed;
focus shifts from 'meeting cutoff' to 'maximizing composite score' |
|
Profile shortlisting unique
to IIMB among top IIMs |
Academic profile included
at Stage 1 shortlisting, not just CAT score |
Aspirants must maintain
high 10th, 12th, UG scores throughout β cannot compensate after the fact |
|
PI at 35% is decisive β
highest among Top-3 |
IIMB PI weightage (35%)
> IIMA and IIMC |
More PI-heavy than peers;
preparation must be comprehensive and in-depth |
|
EWS still very competitive
at 98+ |
Only ~1 percentile point
below General cutoff |
EWS is not a significant
relaxation at IIMB level; still requires near-perfect CAT |
|
SC and ST cutoffs lower but
internally competitive |
SC at 85+, ST at 75+ create
significant gaps from General |
Reserved category
candidates face strong internal competition; target 90+ (SC) and 80+ (ST) for
comfortable conversion |
|
CAT difficulty has minimal
impact on IIMB cutoffs |
Stable at 99+ regardless of
CAT difficulty in any given year |
IIMB's minimum is
effectively the top 1% of all test-takers in every year |
|
100% placements + Triple
Crown accreditation drives demand |
Consistent 100% placement
with avg 34+ LPA sustains extreme applicant quality and volume |
Competition is structural
and self-reinforcing; unlikely to ease in foreseeable future |
12. Comparative Master Table
β IIM Bangalore vs Other Top IIMs (2025)
|
IIM |
Gen Min %ile |
EWS Min %ile |
OBC Min %ile |
SC Min %ile |
ST Min %ile |
CAT Weightage |
PI Weightage |
Selection Strictness |
|
IIM Ahmedabad |
99.5+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
~35% |
~35% |
Extremely High |
|
IIM Bangalore |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
25% |
35% |
Extremely High |
|
IIM Calcutta |
99+ |
98+ |
97+ |
85+ |
75+ |
~30% |
~35% |
Extremely High |
|
IIM Lucknow |
97+ |
90+ |
90+ |
75+ |
65+ |
~40β50% |
~25β30% |
Very High |
|
IIM Kozhikode |
96+ |
88+ |
88+ |
72+ |
60+ |
~35β40% |
~25β30% |
Very High |
|
IIM Indore |
95+ |
85+ |
85+ |
70+ |
58+ |
~40% |
~25% |
High |
|
IIM Shillong |
93+ |
82+ |
80+ |
65+ |
52+ |
~40% |
~25% |
High |
|
IIM Udaipur |
94+ |
80+ |
80+ |
60+ |
40+ |
55% |
25% |
High |
|
IIM Kashipur |
92+ |
75+ |
75+ |
55+ |
35+ |
50% |
30% |
High |
|
IIM Bodh Gaya |
90+ |
82+ |
78+ |
55+ |
45+ |
~35% |
~30% |
Moderate-High |
12.1 Top-3 IIM Comparison β
IIMA vs IIMB vs IIMC
|
Parameter |
IIM Ahmedabad |
IIM Bangalore |
IIM Calcutta |
|
Established |
1961 |
1973 |
1961 |
|
Gen Qualifying Cutoff |
99.5+ |
99+ |
99+ |
|
CAT Weightage |
~35% |
25% |
~30% |
|
PI Weightage |
~35% |
35% |
~35% |
|
Academic Weightage |
~20% |
25% |
~20% |
|
WE Weightage |
~5β10% |
5% |
~5% |
|
AWT/WAT |
~10% |
10% |
~10% |
|
Annual Intake (MBA) |
~390 |
~512 |
~460 |
|
Avg Placement (LPA) |
~34β36 |
~34.1 |
~32β34 |
|
Global Accreditation |
AACSB + EQUIS |
Triple Crown (AACSB + AMBA
+ EQUIS) |
AACSB |
|
Key Strength |
Generalist management;
strongest brand |
Profile-heavy; strongest
for analytics + consulting |
Finance, operations;
Kolkata market strength |
|
Shortlisting Method |
CAT + Profile composite |
CAT + Profile composite |
CAT-based primarily |
13. AWT & PI Performance
β IIMB-specific Insights
|
Component |
Format |
Duration |
Evaluation Criteria |
Weightage |
|
Analytical Writing Test
(AWT) |
Essay on given topic
(business/social/policy) |
30 minutes |
Analytical depth, argument
structure, evidence, language quality, originality |
10% |
|
Personal Interview (PI) |
Panel of 2β3 IIMB faculty
members |
45β60 minutes |
Domain knowledge, work
experience, current affairs, career goals, leadership, intellectual
curiosity, stress handling |
35% |
|
PI Scenario |
CAT %ile |
PI Performance |
Likely Outcome |
|
Strong CAT + Strong PI |
99.7+ |
75β85% PI score |
Very high admission
probability |
|
Strong CAT + Average PI |
99.7+ |
55β65% PI score |
Moderate; profile score may
save if academics strong |
|
Strong CAT + Weak PI |
99.7+ |
Below 50% PI score |
Serious risk of rejection;
35% PI weightage is decisive |
|
Borderline CAT +
Exceptional PI |
99.1β99.3 |
85%+ PI score |
Possible conversion if
academic profile is also strong |
|
Moderate CAT + Moderate PI |
99.0β99.2 |
60β70% PI score |
Very unlikely to convert at
IIMB |
14. Diversity & Profile
Factors β Impact on IIMB Admission
|
Diversity Factor |
Category |
Impact at IIMB |
|
Academic Diversity |
Non-engineers (Commerce,
Arts, Science, Law, Medicine) |
Positive consideration;
IIMB values diverse academic backgrounds; non-engineers with equivalent
academic excellence evaluated favorably |
|
Gender Diversity |
Female candidates |
Positive consideration;
IIMB actively promotes gender balance in MBA cohort; some degree of favorable
evaluation in composite scoring |
|
Work Experience Quality |
All categories |
Quality + reputation of
organization matters; consulting, finance, analytics, tech roles valued
highly in PI evaluation |
|
International Experience |
All categories |
Not a formal criterion but
international exposure enhances PI discussion quality |
|
CAT Dominance Even with
Diversity |
All categories |
Despite diversity factors,
qualifying cutoff (99+) is uniform for General category; diversity benefits
apply at margin within composite score |
15. RTI Process & Data
Credibility
|
Aspect |
Details |
|
Legal Framework |
RTI Act, 2005 β IIM
Bangalore (Government-funded institution) is legally bound to respond to RTI
applications within 30 days |
|
How to File |
Online at rtionline.gov.in
OR by post to IIM Bangalore Public Information Officer (PIO), Bannerghatta
Road, Bangalore |
|
Response Timeframe |
30 days legally mandated;
first appeal within 30 days if denied or unsatisfactory response |
|
Data Typically Provided |
Category-wise minimum CAT
percentiles, sectional cutoffs, composite score cutoffs, shortlist numbers,
final admission numbers |
|
Legal Binding |
Deliberate non-disclosure
or misrepresentation is punishable under RTI Act; IIMB as a public
institution must comply |
|
Limitation 1 |
RTI gives minimum
percentile (exceptional cases), not median/average β most admitted students
score well above the minimum |
|
Limitation 2 |
Does not always capture
composite score details at individual candidate level; aggregated data only |
|
Limitation 3 |
Some requests may receive
partial responses; cross-verification with multiple RTI responses recommended |
|
Limitation 4 |
Profile shortlisting
composite score details may not always be fully disclosed in RTI responses |
|
vs Coaching Institutes |
Coaching estimates have
severe selection bias (only their students); RTI covers all admitted students
across all profiles |
|
Recommended Use |
Use RTI as primary
reference; supplement with official IIMB admission notification, placement
reports, and alumni insights |
16. Frequently Asked
Questions (FAQs)
|
# |
Question |
Answer |
|
1 |
What is the minimum CAT
percentile for IIM Bangalore? |
The published qualifying
cutoff is 99+ overall with 85 percentile in each section (VARC, DILR, QA) for
General category. However, actual admitted candidates score approximately
99.5+ due to composite score competition. Safe preparation target: 99.7β99.9. |
|
2 |
Is 99 percentile enough for
IIM Bangalore? |
99 percentile meets the
published qualifying threshold but is generally insufficient for final
admission. Most admitted students score 99.5+ in CAT. A 99 percentile
candidate needs exceptional academics (10th, 12th, UG) and outstanding PI
(85%+) for any realistic conversion chance. |
|
3 |
What is IIM Bangalore's
composite score formula? |
CAT Score: 25% | 10th
marks: 10% | 12th marks: 5% | UG marks: 10% | Work Experience: 5% | AWT: 10%
| Personal Interview: 35%. IIMB has the most PI-heavy and profile-heavy
formula among Top-3 IIMs. |
|
4 |
Why is IIMB's CAT weightage
only 25%? |
IIM Bangalore deliberately
values holistic evaluation over a single exam. The 25% CAT weightage ensures
that academic consistency (25% from 10th+12th+UG), professional experience,
and interview performance also determine admission. This makes PI (35%) the
single most decisive factor. |
|
5 |
Does IIM Bangalore
participate in CAP? |
IIM Bangalore conducts its
own independent AWT-PI process, not the Common Admission Process (CAP).
IIMB's selection process is entirely managed internally with its own faculty
interview panels, schedules, and evaluation criteria. |
|
6 |
What is the AWT at IIM
Bangalore? |
AWT (Analytical Writing
Test) is a 30-minute writing test conducted as part of IIMB's selection
process. Candidates write an essay on a given topic (business, social,
policy) and are evaluated on analytical depth, argument structure, evidence
quality, language, and originality. It carries 10% of the composite score. |
|
7 |
What does IIMB's Triple
Crown accreditation mean? |
Triple Crown refers to
simultaneous accreditation by AACSB (USA), AMBA (UK), and EQUIS (Europe) β
the three most prestigious B-school accreditation bodies globally. Fewer than
1% of business schools worldwide hold all three. It validates curriculum
quality, faculty credentials, research output, and global standards. |
|
8 |
Do sectional cutoffs matter
at IIM Bangalore? |
Yes β they are absolute and
eliminatory. All three sections (VARC, DILR, QA) must independently clear 85
percentile for General category. Failing even one section = immediate
disqualification regardless of overall percentile. Even a 99.9 overall
candidate with 82 in VARC is rejected at Stage 1. |
|
9 |
What is the safe target for
SC/ST candidates at IIMB? |
SC: qualifying 85+; safe
preparation target 90β92+. ST: qualifying 75+; safe preparation target
82β85+. Reserved category candidates face significant internal competition
within their quota; targeting well above qualifying cutoffs improves
conversion probability. |
|
10 |
How important is work
experience at IIM Bangalore? |
Work experience carries
only 5% composite score weightage at IIMB β relatively low. Freshers are not
significantly disadvantaged. However, work experience enhances PI quality
(35% weightage) through real-world examples and career clarity, making it
indirectly impactful beyond its 5% formal weight. |
|
11 |
Does gender diversity help
female candidates at IIMB? |
Female candidates receive
positive consideration within IIMB's holistic evaluation framework. IIMB
actively promotes gender diversity in its MBA cohort. This provides a
marginal advantage in the composite score evaluation but does not reduce the
99+ qualifying cutoff requirement. |
|
12 |
How does IIM Bangalore
compare to IIM Ahmedabad? |
Both require 99+ overall
CAT. IIMB places more emphasis on profile (25% academics vs IIMA's ~20%) and
has the same PI weightage (35%). IIMA's CAT weightage (~35%) is higher than
IIMB (25%). IIMB has Triple Crown accreditation; IIMA has AACSB+EQUIS. Both are
functionally equivalent at India's top management education level. |
|
13 |
Can a non-engineer get into
IIM Bangalore? |
Yes β IIM Bangalore values
academic diversity and non-engineers with strong academic records, high CAT
scores, and relevant work experience have successfully converted. The 25%
academic weightage rewards consistent excellence regardless of stream, and non-engineering
backgrounds often stand out positively in PI. |
|
14 |
What should I prepare for
the IIMB PI? |
IIMB PI is 45β60 minutes
with a panel of 2β3 faculty. Prepare: your academic background in depth,
every aspect of work experience, current business and economic affairs, your
reasoning for MBA, career goals, IIMB's culture and programs, domain
knowledge (if relevant), and be ready to defend opinions under pressure. |
|
15 |
What is IIM Bangalore's
average placement package? |
For the 2023β25 batch:
Average INR 34.1 LPA, Highest domestic INR 1.07 crore per annum, Highest
international INR 1.16 crore per annum. Top recruiters include McKinsey, BCG,
Bain, Goldman Sachs, Amazon, Google, and other global firms. 100% placement
achieved consistently. |
17. SEO Keywords β High
Volume & Relevant (100+ Keywords)
Primary Keywords
|
Keyword |
Est. Monthly Volume |
Difficulty |
|
IIM Bangalore CAT cutoff |
18,000β24,000 |
High |
|
IIMB minimum percentile |
12,000β16,000 |
High |
|
IIM Bangalore RTI data |
2,000β3,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore admission
2025 |
25,000β35,000 |
Very High |
|
CAT percentile for IIM
Bangalore |
10,000β14,000 |
High |
|
IIMB MBA admission |
15,000β20,000 |
High |
|
IIM Bangalore selection
criteria |
6,000β9,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore category-wise
cutoff |
5,000β7,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore 2025 cutoff |
18,000β25,000 |
Very High |
|
IIM Bangalore composite
score |
4,000β6,000 |
Medium |
Secondary Keywords
|
Keyword |
Est. Monthly Volume |
Difficulty |
|
IIM Bangalore General
category cutoff |
4,000β6,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore EWS cutoff |
2,000β3,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore OBC cutoff |
3,000β4,500 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore SC ST cutoff |
2,500β3,500 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore sectional
cutoff VARC DILR QA |
2,000β3,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore AWT PI
weightage |
1,500β2,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore admission
process |
8,000β12,000 |
High |
|
IIM Bangalore placement
report 2025 |
10,000β15,000 |
High |
|
IIM Bangalore Triple Crown
accreditation |
3,000β5,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore composite
score formula 25 percent CAT |
1,500β2,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore vs IIM
Ahmedabad cutoff |
5,000β8,000 |
Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore vs IIM
Calcutta comparison |
4,000β6,000 |
Medium |
|
IIMB PI preparation tips |
3,000β4,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore AWT topics
2025 |
2,000β3,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore profile
shortlisting formula |
1,200β1,800 |
Low |
Long-tail Keywords
|
Long-tail Keyword |
Est. Monthly Volume |
Difficulty |
|
minimum CAT percentile to
get into IIM Bangalore |
3,000β4,500 |
Medium |
|
RTI data IIM Bangalore
minimum score category wise |
800β1,200 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore CAT cutoff
year wise 2019 to 2025 |
1,200β1,800 |
Low |
|
is 99 percentile enough for
IIM Bangalore |
2,000β3,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore composite
score calculation explained 2025 |
1,000β1,500 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore AWT vs WAT
difference |
800β1,200 |
Low |
|
how to convert IIM
Bangalore PI AWT tips 2025 |
1,500β2,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore SC category
minimum CAT percentile RTI |
600β900 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Bangalore AACSB AMBA
EQUIS Triple Crown meaning |
1,200β1,800 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore profile
shortlisting vs CAT only shortlisting |
700β1,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore vs IIM
Ahmedabad which is better |
6,000β9,000 |
Medium |
|
female candidate advantage
IIM Bangalore admission |
700β1,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore sectional
cutoff 85 percentile explained |
600β900 |
Very Low |
|
IIM Bangalore lowest CAT
score admitted RTI 2024 |
900β1,300 |
Low |
|
can non-engineer get into
IIM Bangalore |
1,500β2,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore placement
average highest salary 2025 |
8,000β12,000 |
High |
|
IIM Bangalore 512 seats
intake category wise |
700β1,000 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore PI panel
experience questions asked |
2,000β3,000 |
Low-Medium |
|
IIM Bangalore 2026 cutoff
prediction trend |
1,200β1,800 |
Low |
|
IIM Bangalore WAT AWT 30
minute writing test preparation |
1,000β1,500 |
Low |
Question-Based / PAA
Keywords (People Also Ask)
|
Search Query |
Type |
Est. Volume |
|
What is IIM Bangalore
cutoff 2025? |
Informational |
10,000β15,000 |
|
How much percentile is
required for IIM Bangalore? |
Informational |
8,000β12,000 |
|
Is 99 percentile enough for
IIM Bangalore? |
Comparison |
4,000β6,000 |
|
What is IIMB's composite
score formula? |
Informational |
2,500β4,000 |
|
Does IIM Bangalore value
work experience? |
Informational |
2,000β3,000 |
|
How is IIM Bangalore
placement 2025? |
Informational |
10,000β15,000 |
|
Is IIM Bangalore better
than IIM Ahmedabad? |
Comparison |
5,000β8,000 |
|
How to prepare for IIM
Bangalore PI 2025? |
How-to |
3,000β5,000 |
|
Can a fresher get into IIM
Bangalore? |
Informational |
2,000β3,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore fees
structure 2025 |
Transactional |
6,000β9,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore Triple Crown
accreditation meaning? |
Informational |
2,000β3,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore average
salary package 2024 2025 |
Informational |
8,000β12,000 |
|
What is AWT in IIM
Bangalore admissions? |
Informational |
2,500β3,500 |
|
Is RTI data reliable for
IIM Bangalore admission? |
Informational |
800β1,200 |
|
IIM Bangalore vs IIM
Calcutta which is better? |
Comparison |
4,000β6,000 |
Category & Comparison
Keywords
|
Keyword |
Type |
Est. Volume |
|
IIM Bangalore vs IIM
Ahmedabad cutoff comparison |
Comparison |
5,000β8,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore vs IIM
Calcutta admission |
Comparison |
4,000β6,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore vs IIM
Lucknow which is better |
Comparison |
3,000β4,500 |
|
Top 3 IIM cutoff comparison
2025 |
Comparison |
5,000β8,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore PwD cutoff
RTI |
Category |
500β700 |
|
IIM Bangalore
non-engineering student admission |
Category |
1,500β2,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore for commerce
students |
Category |
1,200β1,800 |
|
IIM Bangalore for arts
humanities background |
Category |
800β1,200 |
|
IIM Bangalore 2026 cutoff
prediction |
Year-specific |
3,000β4,500 |
|
IIM Bangalore historical
cutoff trend 2019β2025 |
Year-specific |
1,200β1,800 |
|
IIM Bangalore AWT topics
2025 preparation |
Process |
1,500β2,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore PI questions
experience panels |
Process |
2,500β3,500 |
|
IIM Bangalore alumni
network global careers |
Informational |
2,000β3,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore Bannerghatta
campus facilities |
Informational |
1,500β2,000 |
|
IIM Bangalore top
recruiters McKinsey BCG list 2024 |
Informational |
4,000β6,000 |
Data Disclaimer &
Sources
|
Item |
Details |
|
Primary Source |
RTI responses filed with
IIM Bangalore Admission Office |
|
Secondary Sources |
InsideIIM, MBAUniverse,
official IIMB admission notifications, IIMB Annual Placement Reports |
|
Qualifying Cutoff Data |
Official qualifying cutoffs
published annually by IIM Bangalore in official admission notifications |
|
Final Admission Percentile |
Approximate minimums based
on RTI data and cross-verified sources; vast majority of admitted students
score well above minimums |
|
Composite Score Weightage |
Based on latest available
admission cycle announcement; verify annually via official IIMB PGP admission
notification |
|
Projection Note |
2025 estimates are
trend-based; verify with official IIMB announcement for exact 2025β27 cycle
cutoffs |
|
Placement Data |
Based on official IIM
Bangalore Placement Report 2023β25 batch |
|
No Affiliation |
This article is not
affiliated with IIM Bangalore, IIM network, or any coaching institute |